College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

By David McRaney

|

Published: Thursday, February 1, 2007

Updated: Sunday, May 17, 2009

EDITORS NOTE:

Since the original publication of this article we have been inundated with responses from the public at all walks of life. It is important to note that research is ongoing with DCA, and not everyone is convinced it will turn out to be a miracle drug. There have been many therapies that were promising in vitro and in animal models that did not work for one reason or another in humans. To provide false hope is not our intention. There is a lot of information on DCA available on the web, and this column is but one opinion on the topic. We hope you will do your own research into the situation. So, we have added links to resources at the end of this column. If you are arriving here form a linking website like Fark, then those links will not appear because they tend to grab only the text. For those visitors, here is a link to the original research: www.depmed.ualberta.ca/dca

END NOTE

Scientists may have cured cancer last week.

Yep.

So, why haven't the media picked up on it?

Here's the deal. Researchers at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada found a cheap and easy to produce drug that kills almost all cancers. The drug is dichloroacetate, and since it is already used to treat metabolic disorders, we know it should be no problem to use it for other purposes.

Doesn't this sound like the kind of news you see on the front page of every paper?

The drug also has no patent, which means it could be produced for bargain basement prices in comparison to what drug companies research and develop.

Scientists tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body where it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but left healthy cells alone. Rats plump with tumors shrank when they were fed water supplemented with DCA.

Again, this seems like it should be at the top of the nightly news, right?

Cancer cells don't use the little power stations found in most human cells - the mitochondria. Instead, they use glycolysis, which is less effective and more wasteful.

Doctors have long believed the reason for this is because the mitochondria were damaged somehow. But, it turns out the mitochondria were just dormant, and DCA starts them back up again.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Here's the big catch. Pharmaceutical companies probably won't invest in research into DCA because they won't profit from it. It's easy to make, unpatented and could be added to drinking water. Imagine, Gatorade with cancer control.

So, the groundwork will have to be done at universities and independently funded laboratories. But, how are they supposed to drum up support if the media aren't even talking about it?

All I can do is write this and hope Google News picks it up. In the meantime, tell everyone you know and do your own research.

PLEASE READ THE EDITOR'S NOTE AT THE TOP OF THIS COLUMN, AND PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINKS TO OTHER DCA RESOURCES LISTED DIRECTLY UNDER THIS COLUMN.

This is a column of opinion written by Printz Executive Editor David McRaney. Comments can be sent to printz@usm.edu

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 11:04
My mother died of cancer almost 2 years ago. I believed afterward that we need to pump more money into research. Than I asked myself why we can find water on the moon, and can't figure out how to cure cancer with our technology. Perhaps there are two answers. Either, the best cure is the best lifestyle and not using all of the toxic materials in our everyday lives, or, the cure is really out there, but the profits for doctors and drug companies are better if they keep the biggest killer on the planet in play.
Jodey
Sat Sep 19 2009 23:36
The media is corporate and that's why they do not get this out to you. If we had a citizens media network then we would have been aware I believe. It's all about the CORPORATIONS!
Watch the movie "The Corporation" it will help you understand.
Alysssa
Sun Sep 13 2009 17:34
Thats really cool. im glad they've found, hopefully, a cure. But i guess what i dont get is WHY the media isnt reporting it. i mean its a major breakthrough here. wouldnt most people want to know about it?
Chris Oliver
Fri Sep 4 2009 18:13
As a person who has had two types of cancer and am still trying to beat the last one (renal cancer) I would really like to say that any drug that has shown results should be out there avaliable. The drug companies are making too much money and they just want to keep making this hugh amount, $3,500 Aust for one month supply of a drug.28 tablets. Who are they kidding... Wake up Australian government and actually do something.. I will be taking this up with my onchologist at our next appointment...or are the doctors getting kick backs from drug companies for using their treatments
bcdemon
Tue Sep 1 2009 23:21
How many dollars have been pumped into cancer research in the past, decade/century? If there is a definitive "cure" for cancer, everyone (except the money hungry pharmaceutical companies) should dump their dollars into researching it. But no, we will pump money into more research that doesn't benefit anyone that actually has cancer.
Kudos to the teams at the UofA for finding this breakthrough, let's hope it becomes a cure.
anyone
Thu Aug 27 2009 16:04
intresting artical,
i believe what ur saying is true.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In