Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Economics department dodges cut

Published: Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Updated: Monday, September 7, 2009 15:09

After proposing a compromise with Southern Miss administration officials, faculty members in the department of economics dodged the elimination of their program before the Tuesday deadline to notify tenured and tenure-track professors of their termination.

Economics professor Mark Klinedinst said details of the compromise will be discussed sometime next week.

The department has proposed moving the economics bachelor's degree program to the College of Arts and Letters. Before the suggested shift, five current economics faculty will retire: Mark Klinedinst, George Carter, Bill Gunther, Trellis Green, and Ed Nissan.

Four who are not eligible to retire, Sami Dakhlia, Akbar Marvasti, Daniel Monchuk and Deniz Gevrek, will remain as economics faculty.

Denise von Herrmann, dean of the College of Arts and Letters, seemed in favor of the move. She said many economics majors had shown interest in attaining a liberal arts degree rather than a business degree.

"I was against terminating [the department]," said the Academic Planning Group member. "I understand the value of an economics program and voted to keep it."

She said if the shift occurs, economics would complement the other social sciences housed in the College of Arts and Letters.

Dakhlia said he's looking forward to working with von Hermann to explore ways to make economics a "strong asset to the College of Arts and Letters both as a major and as a minor."

Dakhlia was touched by the support for the economics department that students and other faculty members showed through petitions and protests.

"They chose to become vocal and made their opinions and voices be heard…they made all the difference," he said.

Klinedinst lamented that the faculty was not consulted sooner to come to a compromise.

"We realize the university is having a tough time," he said. "People involved have given their lives for this university; we don't want to see it suffer." 

In the end, however, Dakhlia said the appeal they made was strong.

"I know we made our case and I guess in the end reason prevailed," he said.

Klinedinst said he wanted to help preserve USM's reputation by salvaging the program.

"Cutting the economics department didn't make sense," he said. "It didn't even make dollars and cents."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments Log in to Comment

Sami Dakhlia
Thu Sep 3 2009 07:09
Dear "Social Scientist": Please do not misrepresent the facts. (And I hope you are not misrepresenting yourself either.) This is what happened: earlier this year, the CoB Dean asked 3 economics faculty if they'd be willing to move to the CoAL. (I was not one of them.) We economists did not believe that it was a good idea to be split, i.e., have some faculty remain in the CoB as so-called "business economists" and others move to Arts & Letters as "social economists". Via our chair, we collectively responded to the CoB Dean that we wished to remain a single unit. We did NOT, however, exclude the possibility of moving *collectively* to the CoAL. --Sami Dakhlia
Social Scientist
Wed Sep 2 2009 20:59
Fishy or fiction? These guys were invited to join Arts and Letters back in the fall and with open arms before these budget cuts were known. They rejected us then with little passion for the social sciences. Now Professor Dakhlia wants to work with us when he was about to lose his job. Don't expect your false interest in us now to be so warmly received. It looks like we are stuck with you, but don't think that means we want you.
cleetus
Wed Sep 2 2009 17:02
This whole things sounds fishy. The economists "proposed" a compromise and we jump straight to dodging elimination. There's no quotes saying the compromise was accepted. Von Herman told the city paper that she knew nothing of this. Now she's saying she favors the move. Why would she use "favors", as if it's still in discussion mode, if the deal has been accepted as the first paragraph say? Besides, Von Herman has been saying in the media that she didn't see the need to have economics around, now she is saying she was never against them. The language about retirement has some kind of "phased retirement" feel to it. I am betting Carter and Klinedinst are planning to go on phased retirement only to "unphase" it if Saunders gets fired or removed. This is biding time really.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In