Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Proposal presents problems

Students and administrators question the effects of sophomore Daniel Miles’ budget proposal.

Published: Sunday, November 7, 2010

Updated: Monday, November 8, 2010 23:11

printz 1

Christopher Bostick

Sophomore running back Desmond Johnson runs for a first down as Tulane host Southern Miss in New Orleans Saturday.

Sophomore Daniel Miles has received much attention, both positive and negative, over his recent budget proposal to save some of the academic departments that were cut in the school's budget cuts.

 

In short, Miles' proposal would reallocate $192 of the $384 that each student's tuition currently pays toward the athletic department. This money would be put into the academic budget instead to possibly save some of the programs that have been cut or consolidated.

 

To refund the athletic department's $3 million loss, Miles' proposal would have students pay for their tickets to athletic events.

 

Miles believes this plan could ultimately help the athletic department to pull in more revenue than it already receives once it catches on with students.

 

"I think that it could see a loss in the very beginning stages because of attendance," Miles said. "It could meet the $3 million or possibly even generate more revenue if they really sold it to future students."

 

Athletic director Richard Giannini believes that meeting that goal of $3 million could be more difficult than Miles takes into consideration.

 

"A season ticket for football costs $220," Giannini said. "In order to make up a $3 million reduction, 13,636 students would have to purchase a football season ticket."

 

Concerning this aspect of Miles' proposal, USM President Martha Saunders said, "I think we would have to weigh the impact. I think students would have to speak up on that as well."

 

Miles' proposal also suggests that the athletic department seek more external donors to fund athletics. Giannini believes that this proposal would actually make it more difficult to receive any external donations.

 

"A major reduction in operating expenses would affect the quality of the athletics program," Giannini said. "In return this would lower the number of donors who support the university and its athletics program."

 

Saunders said the athletic program already seeks external funding aggressively. She mentioned USM's tennis courts, which were a private gift worth over $1 million, she said.

 

"Richard Giannini has done incredible work in developing private gifts," she said. Saunders also mentioned the Eagle Club Circle of Champions, which is a title given to donors who give $100,000. "[Giannini] grew that from zero to well over 100 Circle of Champion members," Saunders said.

Although Miles believes that his proposal would not hurt the athletics in the long run, he said he will not pursue his proposal unless it allows that athletic department to function at the same level it is accustomed to.

 

"With my proposition, I will not allow athletics to be compromised in that way," Miles said. "If the attendance drops and the athletics will not get enough money, then the proposition will go away peacefully."

 

Miles presented his proposal to the SGA earlier this month. SGA President Kasey Mitchell foresees many of the same challenges as Miles and Giannini.

 

"The proposition has a lot of challenges to overcome, like getting students used to the idea of buying their tickets," Mitchell said.

 

Aside from the uncertainty of how many students would be willing to buy tickets, the proposal brings other risks for the athletic department.

 

Sophomore Seth Barron said, "It bothers me because I don't want to risk not competing at Division I and this proposal makes that seem like a possibility." If Southern Miss loses too much athletic funding, many believe it could cause the school to lose its Division I status, if the school must cut any athletic programs. USM is already at the 16-sport minimum required for Division I.

 

If they could work around this hurdle, they would still have trouble competing at a high level with a reduced budget.

 

"Currently Southern Miss has the lowest athletic budget in C-USA," Giannini said. "A $3 million reduction would substantially put Southern Miss at a disadvantage in one of the missions of the university of having a quality and competitive NCAA Division I athletics program."

 

Miles' proposal has obstacles that would have to be overcome, but it is his goal to provide the best situation for the university's athletics and academics.

 

"If it is not going to support the university and benefit the athletics, then we are not going to do it," Miles said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments Log in to Comment

Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Fri Nov 12 2010 20:43
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Fri Nov 12 2010 15:10
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Fri Nov 12 2010 13:57
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Fri Nov 12 2010 12:36
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Fri Nov 12 2010 11:20
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Thu Nov 11 2010 20:45
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Thu Nov 11 2010 14:35
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Thu Nov 11 2010 13:49
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Thu Nov 11 2010 10:31
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Thu Nov 11 2010 09:43
Do you think that Fedora's raise is the only waste of taxpayers' money by USM and President Saunders? On March 24, 2010, USM Pilots’ Trip Log reported that no passengers were aboard N777AQ for a 2.1 hour flight to Myrtle Beach, NC. The cost? $12,994.11. Martha Saunders boarded N777AQ alone and flew 2.6 hours to Hattiesburg at a cost of $16,087.94. The total cost is $29,082.05. The charge according to USM records was to the “President’s Office”— that is, taxpayers and USM students and faculty.
This trip highlights the utter waste of taxpayer, student, and faculty money and resources. What does a one way ticket from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS cost? Does such waste even warrant an answer? And it doesn’t matter what President Saunders’ purpose was, legitimate or otherwise. It’s simply dumb to spend $29,082.05 on a one way flight from Myrtle Beach, SC to Hattiesburg, MS. For many other examples of waste of taxpayer money go to www.usmnews.net. What's it going to take to change USM?
Chauncey DePree, Jr.
Wed Nov 10 2010 08:46
REPORT from www.usmnews.net:According to Cade Morrow’s 8-Nov-2010 report for The Student Printz entitled “Proposal presents problems,” USM sophomore Daniel Miles is now backing away from his own proposal to bridge a $3 million gap in USM’s FY2012 budget that would allow the institution’s religion, philosophy, deaf education, and other programs/faculty to be retained after 2010-11. According to Miles’ proposal, $192 of the $384 “tuition tax” that is used to support USM athletics would instead by channeled into academic affairs each year. To make up the $3 million shortfall that would occur in athletic director Richard Giannini’s athletics department, Miles proposes that USM students begin paying for tickets to USM sports contests. Under the current “tuition tax” system, tickets are provided to students at no charge (other than the tax). According to Giannini, Miles’ plan creates a major problem for the USM athletics department. To make up the budget shortfall of $3 million, Giannini informed Morrow that 13,636 USM students would have to each buy one $220 season ticket package for football. Sources tell USMNEWS.net that, although Giannini’s math is accurate, his assumption that the entire $3 million be covered by football ticket sales (to students) is flawed. Some of the lost revenue could be made up through ticket sales in basketball and baseball, lessening the pressure on football ticket sales. Not only that, Morrow’s report also reiterates that Miles’ program calls upon Giannini to step up efforts to attract private donations. Still, the USM administration is unimpressed by these arguments. USM president Martha Saunders told Morrow that “. . . Giannini has done incredible work in developing private gifts,” adding that the new USM tennis complex was financed with a private gift of about $1 million. USM student government association president Kasey Mitchell concurs with both Giannini and Saunders, adding that Miles’ proposal faces “. . . a lot of challenges, like getting students used to the idea of buying their tickets.” Sources tell USMNEWS.net, however, that USM students weren’t allowed any time to get used to an increase in the price of campus parking permits. These fees climbed from $50 to $135 – an increase of 170%! -- at the beginning of fall 2009. Sources also say that Saunders’ example of Giannini’s fundraising prowess is lacking, noting that the University of Alabama’s most recent (2010) expansion of Bryant-Denny Stadium – an addition on the south end zone that ultimately cost about $66 million – was “funded entirely with private donations.” At many schools on USM’s level, funding athletics using public dollars (i.e., general fund transfers and tuition taxes) seems to be getting out of hand. As Steve Berkowitz, Jodi Upton, Michael McCarthy, and Jack Gillum point out in their 6-Oct-2010 story for USA Today entitled “How student fees boost college sports amid rising budgets,” during the 2008-09 academic year students were charged more than $795 million to support sports programs at 222 Division I schools. Even after adjusting for inflation, this total represents an increase of 18% above was transferred from students to sports in 2005. The USA Today figure for the 222 institutions produces an average of about $3.5 million, meaning that USM is well above the typical school with its $6 million annual tuition-tax take, and not even including a $0.9 million general fund (E&G) transfer. The problem that numbers like those above point to is an inability of athletics officials to control costs. Giannini’s problem with Miles’ proposal is that it takes revenue from sports (via the aforementioned tuition tax) without finding a replacement revenue stream. Like a career politician addicted to spending tax dollars, sources point out that Giannini never considers the option of curtailing spending in the USM athletics department in order to bridge the $3 million gap. Instead, he runs some numbers and reveals to the public how many students will need to purchase a $220 football season ticket package in order to replace the $3 million diverted by Miles’ plan. This inattention to the costs side of the ledger is, according to sources, a failure of Giannini’s. It was just two years ago that three terminated USM soccer coaches were awarded $1.2 million by a Forrest County jury after suing Giannini for, in part, the sexual harassment faced by one of them from Giannini’s then-associate AD Sonya Varnell. Depending on how it is viewed, this verdict wiped out (1) all of the USM athletics department’s general fund (E&G) transfer from 2008-09 (i.e., about $900,000), as well as (2) $300,000, of the approximately $6 million, of that same year’s tuition tax. As for the “then” in the “then-associate AD Sonya Varnell” above – as the USM website indicates, Varnell continues to hold the senior associate AD position, essentially placing her second in command of USM’s athletics division. All of this brings us back to Miles, who told...

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In