• About
  • Careers
  • Newsletter
News in Brief Officials hope to crack down on building codes

Officials hope to crack down on building codes


A new state law will require counties and cities to adopt a stronger set of standards for the construction of residential and commercial buildings.

This bill is being adapted after the numerous natural disasters that have hit Mississippi in the past decade.

The premise was to standardize minimum requirements in construction as well as plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems. The stricter requirements were aimed at making homes more resistant to natural disasters. With better structures, insurance premiums are expected to drop.

“The bill says that (the state) is trying to crack down on building code law because we have so many losses and much money to pay out on losses,” said Sen. Billy Hudson, R-Purvis.

The governing bodies of counties and cities can pass a resolution opting out of the new provisions within 12o days of them going into effect. While no action is expected until the law takes effect, some local supervisors did not sound happy with legislation. Lamar County District 5 Supervisor Dale Lucus said it would be costly to create a department of building inspection and code enforcement.

The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America  supports the legislation. They said it would protect people’s property by making sure residential and commercial buildings would be able to withstand greater wind speeds and flying debris.

“The people of Mississippi deserve to be protected, and this legislation requires builders to fortify new buildings with materials that can stand up to Mother Nature,” said Donavan Brown, Property Casualty Insurers’ counsel for state government relations.

Currently, Lamar County has no standardized building code, though many builders operate under standardized guidelines.

Hudson said he understood what prompted the law, but objected to the idea of government telling property owners what they have to do.

“I understand after Katrina the terrible situation we had down there, and if we had had stronger buildings, maybe we wouldn’t have suffered so much loss. So, I think maybe building codes in the three southern counties might be necessary, but I don’t think the code you would put in in maybe Harrison County would be necessary in central or north Mississippi.”

Lucus said lawmakers ought to revisit the provision and shift the cost off local governments. But until that happens, Forrest County District 4 Supervisor Rod Woullard said the state has done little more than place an economic burden on the shoulders of county taxpayers.

Yolanda Cruz
Social Media and Copy Editor. Senior News Editorial Journalism major/Political Science minor at The University of Southern Mississippi. Honors College Ambassador. Love reading, watching movies, and listening to music. Hoping to move to a big city one day.

Latest news

Southern Miss shows off firepower to sweep series against UAB

Southern Miss (21-9, 8-3 Conference USA) showed the full range of its firepower as it swept UAB...

Social media shouldn’t be considered a public utility

The United States Supreme Court recently dismissed a case that claimed former president Donald Trump violated the...

SAPA will “Walk A Mile” to raise money for crisis intervention

In an effort to raise money for the Shafer Center for Crisis Intervention, the Sexual Assault Prevention...

Health officials explain COVID-19 vaccination side effects to ease second dose scares

As people continue to receive COVID-19 vaccinations across the country, the growing number of reported side effects...

Nannie Mac’s extends hours for finals week

Nannie Mac’s recently announced that they will be open for later hours during finals week. Ever since...

“Set Him Up” sets Queen Naija up for a great deluxe

On April 8, Queen Naija released a new single, “Set Him Up”, featuring soul singer Ari Lennox....

Must read

Southern Miss shows off firepower to sweep series against UAB

Southern Miss (21-9, 8-3 Conference USA) showed...

Social media shouldn’t be considered a public utility

The United States Supreme Court recently dismissed...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you